Mike Kitanoski - Personal Website

Home / Articles / Why I Love Minimal HTML

Why I Love Minimal HTML

There’s something deeply satisfying about writing pure, minimal HTML. No heavy frameworks. No layers of unnecessary complexity. Just clean markup, served directly to the browser, fast and lean.

Over the years, I’ve built software ranging from simple static sites to large-scale enterprise systems. One lesson has stuck with me: complexity adds weight. It slows things down—development-wise and performance-wise. Minimal HTML reminds me that simplicity is powerful.

It’s Blazing Fast

Plain HTML loads quickly. There’s no JavaScript to parse before rendering the first meaningful paint. No CSS frameworks injecting thousands of rules I don’t need. For visitors, it feels instant.

It’s Accessible by Default

HTML, by its nature, is semantic. Use the right tags—headings, paragraphs, lists—and the result is accessible to screen readers and other assistive tech. No fancy ARIA gymnastics required.

It’s Easy to Maintain

With minimal HTML, there’s less code to manage. Fewer files. Fewer dependencies. Changes are simple—and predictable. That’s a breath of fresh air compared to managing giant front-end stacks for simple pages.

It Encourages Focus

Minimal HTML makes you ask:
“Do I really need this element?”
“Does this style add value?”

It helps me focus on the content and the message, not on chasing visual flourishes.

It’s Surprisingly Beautiful

Some people assume “minimal” means “ugly.” I disagree. Minimal HTML can look elegant, especially paired with a clean monospaced font like IBM Plex Mono, a bit of whitespace, and thoughtful typography.

It’s Just Fun

There’s a certain joy in opening a blank .html file and writing raw markup. No build tools. No npm install. Just me, the text editor, and the browser.

Minimal HTML isn’t the right choice for every project. Complex web apps need more power and structure. But for personal sites, blogs, portfolios—or just exploring ideas—it’s perfect.

It reminds me that sometimes, simple is enough.